It’s fair comment. Why deleted? There will be no freedom of expression in Hong Kong under him.
猙獰的嘴臉
From 壹讀者 posted on 14-09-2011 [22:19:37]:
收到友校同行轉寄城大公關處聲明後馬上找今期週刊一睹為快。主事者嘴臉猙獰，絕對不適合管治香港。
(已刪除)
連合理的議論都刪除，還說沒有壓制言論自由？
抵賴之說
From 如此發言人 posted on 15-09-2011 [07:19:22]:
抵賴：
城大並沒有禁止教職員協會（教協會）發佈問卷調查結果。（發警告信和律師信上沒有禁止字眼，其目的在恐怖嚇阻，用心更加險毒。）
(已刪除)
From 如此發言人 posted on 15-09-2011 [07:19:22]:
Please note that the message has been removed due to incompliance with the Rules for the Higher Education Forum.
鑒於有關的留言違反高等教育論壇的規則，該留言已被刪除。敬請留意。
鉴于有关的留言违反高等教育论坛的规则，该留言已被删除。敬请留意。
Telling Deletion
The University Announcement has degenerated into a platform of smear campaign for the management of City University of Hong Kong to conspire character murder of its union leader.
Shame on CityU. Shame on Hong Kong. Shame on Beijing if it appoints a gutless scoundrel to lead Hong Kong.
The above message was deleted upon protest of the lawyers of the management. After the deletion, a new message appeared:
The University Announcement has degenerated into a platform of smear campaign (已刪除).
They can officially announce information that should be kept strictly private to serve their purpose but they would not allow others to call it as it is.
Now we know what gets on their nerves and on whose nerves. From this we have a much better idea who is behind the whole delete business.
If you posted a comment here under “Office Politics” and you’re not seeing it—sorry! We lost a few comments during the migration process to the new server. Please feel free to post again.
In the summer of 2010, the then SaveCityU.com senior administrator was targetted by senior members of the academic staff of the School of Law at CityU and put under severe pressure to close the site. Following the temporary suspension of access, the domain and its administration was passed to a new, independent group, and has now been resurrected.
The current…
We are actively seeking articles and content that will keep this issue alive and widen the debate.